I have a warlock who uses a whalebone cane (which she casts a modified version of Shillelagh on) --- can I have that act as an arcane focus? Turns out it's RAI. If the swordsman merely carries their sword in some kind of middle guard (a “stoccata” or similar) they will likely not be able to ward the incoming attack strongly enough in time, high or low. Can you use a quarterstaff as a staff for Arcane Focus purposes? Thanks. Is a greatsword really twice as good as a quarterstaff? -The selection of magic staves in the game seem to imply that some staves are not combat ready, but many are both a staff and have explicit rules that they may be wielded as a quarterstaff. And for what it’s worth, that’s probably less practical to do with a great sword. You may be surprised to learn that these weapons are used in almost identical manner, at least in English schools. A bō (棒: ぼう), bong (Korean), pang (Cantonese), bang (Mandarin), or kun (Okinawan) is a staff weapon used in Okinawa. And if it couldn't work with a standard staff, what about a magical one with the quarterstaff property? They kinda stared at me blankly. Honestly, I don't recall her using it once in combat other than to cast spells out of but she could if she wanted to... That's actually breaking the rules. No, that’s half-staffing, as illustrated by later period martial texts like Miller and then cemented in popular culture by Hollywood. Always be sure to use a bo staff caseto securely carry your bo. There was a tweet from one of the designers a while back that said that most arcane focus staves also count as quarterstaff and can be used to hit things. A regular quarterstaff, however, cannot just be used as an arcane focus, as the foci do cost more due to being specially made. Can I Gandalf with a staff and sword and cast spells without doing weird switcheroo shenanigans? Usage notes An attestation from 1590 of a quarter Ashe staffe'' shows that the "quarter" was an apposition and could still be detached (Richard Harvey, ''Plaine Perceuall the peace-maker of England , cited after the OED).Joseph Swetnam (1615) uses "quarterstaff" in the same sense in which George Silver (1599) had used "short staff", viz. The staff’s speed also gives it advantage against some longer weapons; Silver commends the short staff against the long staff and morris pike, and notes that it is not much inferior to the Forrest Bill (Paradoxes). D&D is distorting the weapon stats to reward fighters with more damage, but also fighters get to pose with cool weapons as a consolation for not being able to cast fireballs or look fetching in black. But demonstrating this in practice is hard; when the power is dialled down, the actual speed and threat from the weapon can’t be fully appreciated. The Jackson Rudolph Signature Bo Staff and Jackson Rudolph Professional Bo Staff are the some kind of staff Rudolph uses in competition. (What’s Runequest’s excuse, then? Certainly staff training gives me the greatest concern in WMA. I said something about how between the 4 of them they had one staff. Thanks to everyone who replied. A quarterstaff (plural quarterstaffs or quarterstaves), also short staff or simply staff is a traditional European pole weapon, which was especially prominent in England during the Early Modern period.. You can use anything as an arcane focus. So, I contend that the quarterstaff gets a raw deal. I would think that more DMs would rule it as such than not. Beats me. That said, it only matters on spells with Material components (as they're the only ones that may need a focus as foci just replace material components). (I know there are some in the DMG). I understand there is at least the risk of my focus breaking when I use it as a quarterstaff so if it broke I would probably have to purchase a new focus. But here I’ll just have to ask you to take my word for it; we’re venturing into territory where only a demonstration will be satisfactory. I assume it would also still be an arcane focus...is this a property unique to a few magic items? “Of the two hand sword fight against the like weapon” from Silver’s Bref Instructions: These weapons are to be used in fight as the short staf, yf both play upon dubble & syngle hand, at the two hand sword, the long sword hath the advantage if the weight thereof be not too heavy for his strength that has it, but if both play only upon dubble hand, then his blade which is of convenient length agreeing with his stature that hath it, which is according with the length of the measure of his single swordblade, hath the advantage of the sword that is too long for the stature of the contrary party, because he can cross & uncross, strike & thrust, close & grip in shorter time than the other can. After that I wound down the power to about a quarter but even so still knocked him down several times. Makes sense to me, but wasn't sure if there'd been any real clarification. Press J to jump to the feed. I personally am considering a houserule that allows you to use a weapon as an arcane focus if you spend the same multiplier on it from QS to AF staff (which is escaping me right now). The main reason a two-hander must be kept light is the speed; if the two hander really were absurdly slow, it would make all actions in the time of the hand slower, the weapon would lye spent for longer, and so on. -I'm aware they are not THE SAME THING, but I cannot find limitations on what exactly makes something an arcane focus staff that would disallow it from ALSO being a quarterstaff in functionality. Many competition bo staffs have eye-catching designs that draw attention to the performance. He said afterwards he felt totally helpless because he couldn’t get in range to strike. “What’s that?” you say, “surely you grip the quarterstaff in the middle, like that stout and entirely fictional martial artist Little John”. Or is this a property that any staff can be designed to have? The term is generally accepted to refer to a shaft of hardwood from 6 to 9 feet (1.8 to 2.7 m) long, sometimes with a metal tip, ferrule, or spike at one or both ends. If you take a more holistic view of hit points with a continual wearing down of each side based statistically on relative weapon and skill — well, frankly the staff is more capable than its peers in its ability to harass opponents, full stop. No doubt they were used for judicial and gladiatorial duelling, but that’s probably it. I think it's been stated by the developers that unless a staff specifies that it can't be used in combat, it counts as a quarterstaff in addition to its other properties.


Dolphin Pictures To Draw, Hello World Ios App, Symbolic Interactionism Lesson Plans, Function Of Education Pdf, Allswell Mattress Coupon Walmart, Little Italy Lunch Buffet Menu, Englander Mattress Vs Beautyrest, Chandigarh To Patiala Road Map,